Southport : Original Sources in Exploration

Troy and Ilium: Results of the Excavations at Troy 1870-1894

Wilhelm Dorpfeld


Chapter 2 (part 15)

7. Layer VII:  two pre-Greek settlements. (p.183)


Over the ruins of the layer VI Castle, a new settlement was built after some time. We do not know whether this happened soon or whether the destroyed castle was completely deserted for a long time. We found simple buildings that served as dwellings, magazines and perhaps also as stables above the ruined walls of the stately sixth layer. These are the same buildings that I described as storerooms in the provisional report on the excavations of 1894 (Athen. Mittheilungen 1894, p. 391 and Table IX) and which I still believe to be ascribed to the last period of the VI Castle, shortly before its destruction.

On the plan of that tablet I had counted it as part of the sixth layer, but differentiated it from the other buildings in this layer by means of a different hatching, because they were clearly distinguished from them by their type of construction and their altitude. As it turned out, their assignment to layer VI later turned out to be wrong. However, the houses known at that time and drawn on the plan were all located in the wide path between the castle wall and the first row of VI residential houses, so it could be assumed that they existed at the same time as the latter.

But we had already noticed that they were getting so close to the retaining walls of the VI layer buildings that traffic between them was hardly possible. Later, several walls were added, which undoubtedly reach over some of the wall foundations of Castle VI and must therefore be more recent than the destruction of this castle. In addition, their affiliation with the VI layer is ruled out by the fact that the floor slabs surrounding the well B c, which certainly date from the same time as the houses, apparently go beyond the retaining wall of the building VI F, which has already been demolished, and can therefore no longer belong to the VI layer. We therefore assign the houses to a 1st period of the VII stratum, and designate the previously designated VII settlement as a 2nd period of this stratum.

However, we could also have designated the houses formerly assigned to level VII as a level VIII settlement and then assigned a different number to the higher levels as well. In this way we would have received a total of ten layers instead of nine. But such a renaming of several strata is not only to be avoided in general, but would even have been incorrect in our case.

In fact, the houses that we erroneously counted earlier in the 2nd period of the VI castle belong to the same stratum as the buildings formerly designated as the VII stratum. The older houses were still widely used by the younger residents in the second period of the seventh shift and some of them were rebuilt. The new houses also did not have a significantly higher floor. In the case of these houses, therefore, we must not speak of two different strata, but only of two periods of the same stratum.

a. The 1st period of the VII layer
(p.184)


All the walls from the first period of the VII stratum are distinguished on Plate 6 by a different shade of color from the more recent walls of the same stratum. The most important of the films are also drawn on a larger scale in Figures 70-72, and, as all the more recent walls are omitted, can be better surveyed. According to the earlier plan, the individual houses of level VII-1 are named in all of these floor plans with the small Greek letters a-w, with the addition of the number VII to designate the level. On the other hand, the walls of the sixth layer, insofar as they were then still standing and could therefore be  used, are hatched crosswise, but where they were buried and no longer visible, they are provided with a dotted line. The walls from the 1st period of the VII layer are simply hatched.



Plate 6: Plan of Troy ruins from the layers VII and VIII.

We have already explained earlier how it was that the castle wall of the buildings of the VI layer escaped complete destruction and was thus found partially still standing by the new settlers. The new residents built their houses on these remains of the ring wall, using the remaining upper wall as a rear wall. Dwellings were also added to some of the retaining walls of the inner buildings, such as the western wall of 
Building VI M. While several of the houses consist of a square, mostly not quite right-angled room, others (particularly many in the east) have no front wall and are open halls; their side walls terminate in front in square pillars or parastades. In some rooms of this type there is still an inner transverse wall (e.g. in VII ß, VII Y and perhaps also in VII a); here, then, was an open vestibule and a closed room. One would like to assume that there were also such transverse walls in the other open spaces (e.g. in Vfl C, VII -q and VII 6), but nothing of this can be seen anymore.

A certain similarity between the floor plans of the buildings of levels VI and VII cannot be denied hereafter. In both strata we find as dwellings simple rooms, or open halls with a closed room behind, and in both cases the houses are arranged close together in circles. In the younger layer we know of course only one such circle, but in two places at least the remains of some buildings lying further inwards have been preserved. They also differ in that the younger houses are smaller and have common partition walls, while the large houses of the VI layer have their own enclosing walls and are even separated from each other by narrow spaces.

But these differences are not great. The resemblance is so overwhelming that we may assume the same ethnic group as the inhabitants of both (p.185) strata, taking into account the similarity in relation to the pottery ware presented in the next chapter. Of course, the stately buildings of the VI layer were the dwellings of the ruler and his relatives, while the simpler buildings of the I period of VII must be considered the houses of simple peasants.

When the destroyed Castle VI was set up again as a residential area, the castle wall was probably still standing enough that repairs and small additions could be made to restore it to a defensible condition. We can conclude that on the one hand from the fact that the upper wall still served as the back wall of most houses, and on the other hand from the fact that the castle gate S was still used as a gate at that time.

Although the old gate of Layer VI was buried, a new gate VII S was built 2m higher in the same place. We have already seen its outline in fig.41, and its ground plan can be found in figs.70 and 71. In the latter two plans the gate opening is marked (cd) and the (p.186) older corner of the wall that is used for this had, denoted by (be). To close the gate, a wooden frame, shown in fig.41, was arranged at (cd), against which wooden door leaves leaned. The old gate (h) from the VI layer was destroyed and buried.

A new castle wall (b f a) was perhaps built in front of the gate at that time, which presumably reached as far as tower VI h and then between a and VI h, where it is dotted in fig.71, must have had a passage. However, this wall could possibly have been built as early as the end of the VI layer, as evidenced by its deep location and fairly good execution. It would then be able to be erected at the same time as the wall through which the west gate VI U was walled up.

On the other hand, the assumption cannot be denied that it only came into being in the 2nd period of layer VII, because at that time, as we shall see, several houses were built in the space between it and the eastern castle wall VI. The decision for one of these three options is only possible after the entire wall has been uncovered. The excavated piece b a is drawn in section in fig.74 and can also be seen on Photo 27 in the foreground on the left. Its outer slope at f (fig.71) coincides exactly with the slope of the corner of the VI layer wall and gradually decreases to the south, presumably to merge with the steeper slope of Tower VI h.

The southern gate T seems to have existed unchanged as a gate in layer VII-1. It is not known how far the floor had risen here. It has already been assumed above that an extension to the castle wall uncovered here and shown in fig.42 (p. 132) may have been built at this time. No trace has been found of other gates from the 1st period of the VII stratum.

The buildings inside the castle, of which we have found a large number, deserve a brief description. The northernmost of them, VII alpha, located in squares J 5 and K 5, was cut through by Schliemann's northeast ditch and is therefore only partially preserved. Its outline is drawn in addition in fig.70. Two corners of the wall (r and q) form an open vestibule, behind which there was probably a closed room; because at s a piece of a transverse wall seems to have been preserved. As with most buildings of this period, the upper castle wall served as the rear wall of the room.

The neighboring building VII beta is better preserved. Between the vestibule and the room the wall with a small door is still preserved in its lower part. Besides several pithoi, five of which were found in the room and one in the vestibule, a quadrangular depression in the floor has emerged at t, which must have served to store grain.

The neighboring building VII gamma is somewhat smaller than VII beta, but of the same shape. Here, too, 7 pithoi have been preserved in the vestibule and the closed rooms. The fact that its southern wall is shorter than the (p.187) northern one can be explained by the attempt not to narrow the wide access to gate S. For the same reason, the neighboring building VII delta, in which 4 pithoi also appeared, has a triangular floor plan.

Fig.70:  The houses of the 1st period of the VII layer near the eastern gate VII S.


This group of 4 buildings could be mistaken for a single dwelling house consisting of several rooms; but such a view seems to me incorrect. Because, on the one hand, the similarity of most of the buildings in terms of their floor plan and, on the other hand, the fact that they are not connected by intermediate doors, but all open towards the main path, in my opinion sufficiently prove that these are individual residential buildings with common border walls.

Because of the large number of pithoi found in some rooms, one might be tempted to declare all the structures to be magazines. There is no denying that some of these (e.g. VII e and y.) were magazines or storerooms, but most certainly served as dwellings. The pithoi did not, in fact, occupy so much space as it appears from the plan, for here the greatest diameters of the vessels are drawn, while in fact only their much smaller upper margins were visible above the floor.

A second group of houses of settlement VII-1 adjoins the gateway to the south-west and ends at the paved square next to the fountain B c. There are 5 houses or chambers (fig.71), of which the 1st  and 5th were closed rooms, the three middle but large open halls. The 1st House, called VII epsilon, appears to have been attached to its neighboring building VII zeta only later, because at 1 a free-standing corner was originally bricked, to which wall k abuts.

The three buildings VII zeta, VII eta, and VII theta are large open halls, averaging about 5m wide and about 10m deep. We have already pointed out the possibility that these rooms originally also had interior walls, as in the northern group of houses. If such transverse walls were once there, they were demolished during the reconstruction of the houses in the 2nd period of the 7th layer. However, it must be expressly mentioned that we have not yet noticed any traces of former inner walls. The front wall corners 1, m, n and o have been partially preserved despite the later reconstruction and are still clearly visible within or below the younger walls.

Fig.71: Houses from the I Period of the VII Strata, southwest of Gate VII S.

Just off the corner (o) we found a well B c and around it a square paved with large stone slabs. We have already shown on p.176 above and in fig.66 that the well comes from the sixth layer and was only used again by the seventh settlers and raised for this purpose. Because of its good paving, the square can be regarded as the main fountain square of the VII layer, at any rate we have not found a paving that was even remotely as well prepared in any part of the settlement. When we uncovered the large stone slabs, we were inclined to assign them to the VI layer despite (p.188) their high position. However, after it had been shown that the plaster safely reached over the destroyed front wall of building VI F, there could no longer be any doubt that it had only been made after the buildings of level VI had collapsed.

Next to the fountain square, two remains of buildings from settlement VII-1 have been preserved, which do not lean against the castle wall. These are the two buildings q and r in fig.71, the first of which is built on the foundations of building VI G (cf. p. 162). We could not quite determine the floor plan because some of it was already destroyed in antiquity and altered by subsequent settlers.

(p.189) Further to the south-west, in and next to the Roman theater B, some walls of houses from the 1st period of the VII stratum have been found, VII iota and VII chi. The latter building, recognizable by its parastade-like corner of the wall, has come to light under the rows of seats in Theater B in square H 8 and was apparently a house attached to the castle wall. It probably agreed in plan with the buildings of our period described above, and contained, like several of these, a larger number of pithoi. So it might have served as a storage room.

While only small remains of houses from our period are known in the southern part of the castle, we have again found several houses in the western part, near the former gate VI U. It is true that almost all of them were rebuilt or somewhat altered in the later period of the seventh stratum, but their floor plans could still be produced with some certainty as they are drawn in fig.72.

Fig.72: Houses from the 1st period of the VII stratum, in the vicinity of Gate VI U.

(p.190) Several of these houses (VII mu, nu, xi, omicron, pi, and rho) lean against the southern castle wall of the VI layer. The first two are now very shallow, but probably formerly reached, as indicated by dotting in fig.72, over the lower part of the castle wall to the upper wall. In figure 77 only the smaller depth is drawn. Since not only the superstructure of the southern ring wall but also the upper part of the lower wall was completely destroyed, it is not possible to speak with certainty about the extent of the chambers. We have shown a section through VII mu (a in fig.39). While the third house (VII xi), like mu and nu, still has a door in the east wall, in the building VII omicron, which is remarkable because of the six pithoi found in it, the position of the door is not known. Of the two houses VII pi and VII rho adjoining to the north-west, only the common partition wall is preserved, which in front is a square pillar (a) There appear to have been similar open halls on the western wall of the castle as on the eastern wall.

Separated from this row of houses by a path, several buildings have been found which seem to have belonged to a second concentric row of dwellings. The first to be mentioned here is House VII epsilon, which was attached to the western retaining wall of the large building VI M, which was still standing. We recognize its wall facing the path in the photograph of fig.73, where it is marked with the letter b. It abuts on the right the corner a of VI M, built of large stones, and does not go down as deeply as this, but stands on rubble.

When it was built, the lower part of the beautiful corner was already underground. They are made of small stones, some of which are cut at right angles and are therefore taken from the ruined buildings of the VI layer. It is only about 1 m high. The upper part of the wall (d) can be recognized not only by the upright slabs c as a work from the 2nd period of layer VII, but also by the fact that it extends over wall b to the left. There the slabs (c) stand directly on the rubble and form the sole foundation of the wall. The walls visible in the background on the left (d and e) belong to the more recent period, while the wall (f) shown in the foreground is the northern wall of Room VII nu, discussed above.



 Fig.73: The corner (a) of VI M with a house wall (b) of the 1st period and two house walls (d) of the 2nd period of layer VII.

Only small remains of the walls of Building VII tau, which lay further to the north-west, have survived; they do not suffice to supplement the floor plan even as a supposition. We even have doubts as to whether these walls belong to layer VII or whether they belong to an older stratum.

Building VII sigma has been preserved all the better, the ground plan of which can be seen on Plate VI and the outline of which can be seen in several pictures. We have already noticed its south-west corner in fig.33 (p. 106), recognizable by the (p.191) large cuboids c, which apparently come from a ruined building of the sixth layer. Also in fig.32 (p.105) a piece of its western wall (d) appears in the background. In this picture we can see from a dark stripe below the third row of stones from the top that a longitudinal beam made of wood was once built into the wall. The bearing of this beam can be seen more clearly on photo 23 (on p. 152). The western wall of a here runs from the middle of the picture to the right edge and bears the letter e. In its left part, behind the worker, the place of the former wooden beam immediately catches the eye as a straight, dark line. Since we have also (p.192) found a similar use of wooden beams in a wall of level VI, we may recognize here a further point of agreement between the buildings of levels VI and VII-1.

In contrast to all the buildings of the VII layer discussed so far, the house VII sigma consists of several adjacent and interconnected rooms, as the ground plan on plate VI shows. However, the interior walls, some of which are in a very poor state of preservation, may not all date from the 1st period; in any case, some were added later. That the building actually underwent multiple changes and additions in the 2nd period of the 7th layer can be seen both from the floor plans and from the photographs already mentioned.

The floor plans also show that the house is located just above the ruined walls of Building VI A, without these having been used as foundations in any way. The VII settlers therefore no longer knew anything about building VI A. Its superstructure was completely destroyed and its foundations were buried when the houses of the VII layer were built.

Further to the north-west and all along the north side of the castle, only small fragments of walls of layer VII-1 have survived, all of them so insignificant that they cannot be arbitrarily added to full structures. Nevertheless, they prove that the houses of this settlement certainly extended a little further on the periphery of the castle than they are now preserved. We do not know whether they also extended along the entire north side, but it seems to me at least very probable.

Finally, if we take a look at the general arrangement of the buildings from the 1st period of the VII layer, we see before us a large number of individual chambers or houses, which mostly lean on the inside of the remaining remains of the castle wall and the space between them and the terrace walls. They formed a circle of dwellings around the higher center of the castle.

The fact that other houses formed a second inner circle opposite them is confirmed by a few remains of buildings, without Hesse being able to make a definite judgment about the number of these houses. Further to the middle of the castle hill no houses seem to have stood. At least, in some places where houses of our period might have survived, no trace of them has been discovered.

In general, nothing has been found that justifies us in assuming further houses or a sanctuary on the upper slopes and the top of the hill. The old castle wall still ran around the whole settlement. It wasn't as stately as it used to be, because the lower wall was partly buried under the rubble and the upper wall had probably only undergone makeshift repairs, but it was probably still defendable. We were able to present a picture of one of the two gates, which were probably in the course of the circular wall (fig.41 on p. 129).













Photo 28:  Eastern castle wall (a) of the VI layer; castle wall (b and c) of the eighth layer; house wall (g) of the VII layer; Cuboid foundation (d) of the columned hall IX M.












[Continue to Chapter 2, part 16]

[Return to Table of Contents]


Southport main page         Main index of Athena Review

Copyright  ©  2023    Rust Family Foundation.  (All Rights Reserved).

.